Expressionlines
Beauty, Essence of Well Being!
Home
Revision Skin Care
Kinerase
Specials
Skin Care Treatments
Skin Care Basic
Facials
Sun & Laser Burns
Puffy & Dark Under Eyes
Wrinkles & Expression Lines
IPL Photorejuvenation
Microdermabrasion
Smoking Speeds Up Aging
A Wrinkle In Time
Summer Skin Guide
Misconceptions about skin
UVA & UVB Rays and Aging
Aging and Myths
Dark Under Eye Circles
Coenzyme Q10: Anti-wrinkle protection
Spider Veins
Cellulite and Mesotherapy
Rosacea treatments
Fantastic Skin
Ms Beautiful Eyes
Chemical Peels
Strivectin SD Myth
Acne Scars & Treatments
Tanning Beds & Cancer
News
Testimonial
Store Policy
Contact Us
Shopping Cart

Tanning Beds and Skin Cancer (Melanoma)


Studies Finally Link Tanning Beds to Melanoma

TIMOTHY F. KIRN(Sacramento Bureau)


VANCOUVER, B.C. — Two new studies presented at the Sixth World Congress on Melanoma have linked tanning bed use and melanoma.

“The year 2005 sees the first real, indisputable evidence that tanning bed use contributes to melanoma risk,” said Philippe Autier, M.D., of the Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, the chair of the session at which the studies were presented.

The larger of the two studies looked at tanning bed use by 106,000 Scandinavian women enrolled in a lifestyle study in the early 1990s, part of which involved a survey that asked if they used tanning equipment, when, and for how long.

When the survey was repeated with a portion of the subjects 5 years after the initial one, the answers of 79% of surveys agreed completely with how the subjects had answered before, and 96% had a high, but not exact, agreement, suggesting the reports were very accurate, said Marit Bragelien Veierød, Ph.D., of the department of biostatistics at the University of Oslo.

With the data broken into age groups by decade, those in the 20- to 29-year age group who used tanning equipment one or more times a month had a 57% higher relative risk of melanoma, those in the 30- to 39-year age group had a 44% increased risk, and those in the 40- to 49-year age group had a 69% higher risk.

Comparing all those who reported having ever used tanning equipment with those who had never used it, the study showed an increased relative risk of 33% associated with tanning equipment use.

The second study compared tanning equipment use in subjects who were enrolled in the international Genes, Environment, and Melanoma Study and who had single primary melanomas (406 cases) with those who had multiple primary melanomas (125 cases).

Overall, 29% of the subjects had used tanning equipment, and the mean age at initial diagnosis of melanoma in those who had used it was 10 years younger than those who had never used it, said Maria Chiu, of Cancer Care Ontario, located in Toronto.

After adjustment for age and sex, the data indicated that tanning equipment use was associated with a higher risk of multiple melanomas, with an odds ratio of 1.68. For those in the highest quartile of frequency of use, the odds ratio was 1.87. For those whose first exposure was before age 20 years, the odds ratio was 2.63, she said.

The data indicate a strong dose response to tanning equipment use, Ms. Chiu added.

Previous studies that attempted to associate tanning bed use with melanoma were generally inconclusive, probably because these studies tended to be too small to have adequate statistical power, according to the investigators and others at the meeting.

 

Use of Multi-Protection Cream SPF 30+ or SPF 30 Lotion With Green Tea (Oil Free) will protect you from the UVA/UVB radiation. 

 

Tanning Beds – More Dangerous than Sunlight?

Medical Author: Melissa Stoppler, M.D.
Medical Editor: Barbara K. Hecht, Ph.D.

Many people today still want a tan despite the fact that sun exposure is known to be associated with skin cancer and premature ageing of the skin. A tan is often seen as cosmetically attractive and as an outward sign of good health.

A tan is actually a sign of skin damage. Skin cells that have been damaged by ultraviolet (UV) radiation produce more of the pigment melanin and that is what produces the tan.

Many people think that tanning booths and beds are safe alternatives to acquiring a tan “naturally” outdoors. This is based on the erroneous belief that tanning indoors does not damage the skin. This false sense of security has encouraged the frequent use of tanning booths and beds.

In fact, they may be even more dangerous. Natural sunlight contains a mixture of both short-wave UV-B and longer wave UV-A rays. Both UV-A and UV-B exposures can lead to premature ageing of the skin, and both increase a person’s risk of developing skin cancer, including malignant melanoma. The difference is that UV-B rays cause more rapid tanning and burning while UV-A rays do not cause burning until exposure levels are very high.

Indoor tanning booths and beds most commonly use ultraviolet bulbs that emit predominantly UV-A rays. Unfortunately, UV-A rays penetrate more deeply into the skin and can even adversely affect the cells involved in the body’s immune response in addition to raising an individual’s risk of developing malignant melanoma and other cancers of the skin.

In conclusion, there is no scientific evidence that the use of tanning beds and booths is any less damaging or harmful than exposure to outdoor sunlight. To the contrary, the evidence suggests that indoor tanning may be even more damaging and dangerous, especially because some people become addicted to maintaining a deep, dark tan irrespective of the season.

Reference: “Sunbeds, tanning and UV exposure”. World Health Organization (WHO) Fact Sheet No. 287, March 2005.

Send Page To a Friend